Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs Celeron 2950M
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Celeron 2950M by a whopping 2677% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2687 | 262 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 13 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 38.58 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.98 | 16.97 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $449 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 162 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 89 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCPGA946 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | 86x MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A,-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, BMI1, BMI2, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT SHA, XFR2, Precision Boost 2 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-5200 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) (400 - 2200 MHz) |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| VGA | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 24 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.77 | 21.38 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.75 | 4.29 |
| Recency | 1 September 2013 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 37 Watt | 120 Watt |
Celeron 2950M has 224.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 7800X3D, on the other hand, has a 2676.6% higher aggregate performance score, 472% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 340% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2950M in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron 2950M is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
