Celeron 1005M vs 2950M

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2950M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.78
+11.4%
Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Celeron 2950M outperforms Celeron 1005M by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26242702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.991.88
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$86

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s5 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size118 mm294 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FCPGA988
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft--

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGA+no data
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2950M 0.78
+11.4%
Celeron 1005M 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2950M 1234
+11.4%
Celeron 1005M 1108

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 0.70
Recency 1 September 2013 1 July 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 2950M has a 11.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

Celeron 1005M, on the other hand, has 5.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 2950M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2950M and Celeron 1005M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2950M
Celeron 2950M
Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 13 votes

Rate Celeron 2950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 249 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2950M or Celeron 1005M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.