Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE vs Celeron 220

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 220
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 19 Watt
0.13
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.92
+2146%

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE outperforms Celeron 220 by a whopping 2146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33431662
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.657.89
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Dali (2020)
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads14
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm12 nm
Die size77 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479AM4
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 220 0.13
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE 2.92
+2146%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 220 209
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE 4633
+2117%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 2.92
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 220 has 84.2% lower power consumption.

Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, on the other hand, has a 2146.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 220 is a notebook processor while Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
AMD Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 61 vote

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 29 votes

Rate Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.