Atom C3808 vs Celeron 1037U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2770not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.51no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$369

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64K (per core)672 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)12 MB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C86 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size32 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808.

PCIe version2.03
PCI Express lanes1616
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data16
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data16
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 January 2013 15 August 2017
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 25 Watt

Celeron 1037U has 47.1% lower power consumption.

Atom C3808, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 1037U is a notebook processor while Atom C3808 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1037U and Atom C3808, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1037U
Celeron 1037U
Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 75 votes

Rate Celeron 1037U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1037U or Atom C3808, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.