EPYC 9015 vs Celeron 1020E
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2541 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.41 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Turin (2024) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $527 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 16,630 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | G2 (988B) | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 January 2013 | 10 October 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Celeron 1020E has 257.1% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9015, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1020E is a notebook processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1020E and EPYC 9015, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
