Sempron 140 vs Celeron 1007U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1007U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
+71%
Sempron 140
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.31

Celeron 1007U outperforms Sempron 140 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28673109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency2.950.65
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)22 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$40

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus typeDMIno data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size118 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023AM3
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel ProcessorsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1007U 0.53
+71%
Sempron 140 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1007U 840
+72.8%
Sempron 140 486

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1007U 252
Sempron 140 310
+23%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1007U 422
+33.5%
Sempron 140 316

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.31
Recency 20 January 2013 22 July 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 45 Watt

Celeron 1007U has a 71% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1007U is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 140 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1007U is a notebook processor while Sempron 140 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1007U and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1007U
Celeron 1007U
AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 126 votes

Rate Celeron 1007U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 233 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1007U or Sempron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.