Processor 300 vs Celeron 1005M

Place in the ranking	2719	1319
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	1.89	9.28
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date	1 July 2013 (11 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$82

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Processor 300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	4
Base clock speed	1.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.9 GHz	3.9 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	128 KB	80 KB (per core)
L2 cache	512 KB	1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache	2 MB	6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Die size	94 mm²	163 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Processor 300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCPGA988	1700
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor 300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
TSX	-	+
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Processor 300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	+
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor 300 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor 300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors	Intel UHD Graphics 710
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Processor 300 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Processor 300.

PCIe version	2.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	16	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70

Processor 300 4.51
+544%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1109

Processor 300 7160
+546%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.70	4.51
Integrated graphics card	0.77	2.85
Recency	1 July 2013	8 January 2024
Threads	2	4
Chip lithography	22 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	46 Watt

Celeron 1005M has 31.4% lower power consumption.

Processor 300, on the other hand, has a 544.3% higher aggregate performance score, 270.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Processor 300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1005M in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Processor 300 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Processor 300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.