Celeron 420 vs 1005M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1005M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
+367%
Celeron 420
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.15

Celeron 1005M outperforms Celeron 420 by a whopping 367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27193323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.890.41
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$23

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die size94 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data60 °C
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching--
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1005M 0.70
+367%
Celeron 420 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1005M 1109
+372%
Celeron 420 235

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm

Celeron 1005M has a 366.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 1005M is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1005M is a notebook processor while Celeron 420 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1005M and Celeron 420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1005M
Celeron 1005M
Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 254 votes

Rate Celeron 1005M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 170 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1005M or Celeron 420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.