Pentium E5400 vs Celeron 1000M

Place in the ranking	2731	2781
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	8.46
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop processor
Series	Intel Celeron	no data
Power efficiency	1.81	0.89
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	18 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$55

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	2	2
Base clock speed	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.8 GHz	2.7 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256K (per core)	2 MB (shared)
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	0 KB
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
Die size	118 mm²	82 mm²
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	74 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	228 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCPGA988	LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	+	+
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	-
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	-
EDB	+	+
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	-
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors	On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	16	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1000M 0.67
+9.8%

Pentium E5400 0.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1000M 1069
+9.6%

Pentium E5400 975

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1000M 296

Pentium E5400 311
+5.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1000M 509
+0.4%

Pentium E5400 507

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.67	0.61
Recency	20 January 2013	18 January 2009
Chip lithography	22 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	65 Watt

Celeron 1000M has a 9.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400.

Be aware that Celeron 1000M is a notebook processor while Pentium E5400 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1000M and Pentium E5400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.