EPYC 75F3 vs Celeron 1000M

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2729	51
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	5.93
Market segment	Laptop	Server
Series	Intel Celeron	AMD EPYC
Power efficiency	1.83	14.58
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Milan (2021−2023)
Release date	20 January 2013 (11 years ago)	12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	$4,860

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	2	64
Base clock speed	1.8 GHz	2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.8 GHz	4 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
Multiplier	no data	29.5
L1 cache	64K (per core)	2 MB
L2 cache	256K (per core)	16 MB
L3 cache	2 MB (shared)	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm+
Die size	118 mm2	8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	105 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	105 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,400 million	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	2
Socket	FCPGA988	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	-	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
Flex Memory Access	+	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
FDI	+	no data
Fast Memory Access	+	no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Anti-Theft	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	-	+
VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	32 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	Intel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processors	N/A
Graphics max frequency	1 GHz	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported	3	no data
eDP	+	no data
DisplayPort	+	-
HDMI	+	-
SDVO	+	no data
CRT	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version	2.0	4.0
PCI Express lanes	16	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	0.69	43.95
Recency	20 January 2013	12 January 2021
Physical cores	2	32
Threads	2	64
Chip lithography	22 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1000M and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---