Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs C-70
Primary details
Comparing C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3241 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.12 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | no data |
| Release date | 1 September 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Security technologies
C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6290 (280 - 400 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2012 | 1 January 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 17 Watt |
C-70 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 88.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-70 and Core 2 Solo SL3400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
