Ryzen 5 6600HS vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 642 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 32.31 |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | AMD Radeon 660M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
C-30 has 288.9% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 6600HS, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Ryzen 5 6600HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
