i9-10800F vs C-30
Primary details
Comparing C-30 and Core i9-10800F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3356 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD C-Series | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.16 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
C-30 and Core i9-10800F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-30 and Core i9-10800F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-30 and Core i9-10800F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 40 nm, 1.24-1.35V | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
C-30 and Core i9-10800F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-30 and Core i9-10800F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-30 and Core i9-10800F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by C-30 and Core i9-10800F.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 January 2011 | 30 April 2020 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 65 Watt |
C-30 has 622.2% lower power consumption.
i9-10800F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between C-30 and Core i9-10800F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that C-30 is a notebook processor while Core i9-10800F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between C-30 and Core i9-10800F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
