Celeron 887E vs Aubrey Isle

VS

Primary details

Comparing Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKnights Ferry (2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date31 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads1282
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache32 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size684 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors2,300 million504 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPCIe x16no data
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 32 2
Threads 128 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 17 Watt

Aubrey Isle has 1500% more physical cores and 6300% more threads.

Celeron 887E, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1664.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Aubrey Isle is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 887E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Aubrey Isle and Celeron 887E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Aubrey Isle
Aubrey Isle
Intel Celeron 887E
Celeron 887E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Aubrey Isle on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 887E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Aubrey Isle or Celeron 887E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.