Xeon D-1813NT vs Atom x7425E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7425E
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
3.60
Xeon D-1813NT
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 42 Watt
5.05
+40.3%

Xeon D-1813NT outperforms Atom x7425E by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15301228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency27.3610.96
Architecture codenameGracemont (2023)no data
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)10240 KB
Chip lithography10 nmno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1744FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt42 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channelDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data256 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 24EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes916
USB revisionno data3.0
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7425E 3.60
Xeon D-1813NT 5.05
+40.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7425E 5502
Xeon D-1813NT 7732
+40.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.60 5.05
Recency 3 January 2023 1 October 2023
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 42 Watt

Atom x7425E has 250% lower power consumption.

Xeon D-1813NT, on the other hand, has a 40.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 100% more threads.

The Xeon D-1813NT is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7425E in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7425E is a notebook processor while Xeon D-1813NT is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7425E and Xeon D-1813NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7425E
Atom x7425E
Intel Xeon D-1813NT
Xeon D-1813NT

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom x7425E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1813NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7425E or Xeon D-1813NT, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.