Ultra 9 288V vs Atom x7-Z8750

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8750
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.80
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.30
+1438%

Core Ultra 9 288V outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 1438% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2602620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data38.80
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cacheno data192 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)Arc 140V
Max video memory8 GBno data
Graphics max frequency600 MHzno data
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160no data
Max resolution over eDP2560x1600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes24
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-Z8750 0.80
Ultra 9 288V 12.30
+1438%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-Z8750 1272
Ultra 9 288V 19542
+1436%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom x7-Z8750 2426
Ultra 9 288V 12505
+415%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-Z8750 24.7
Ultra 9 288V 9
+174%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 1
Ultra 9 288V 7.7
+702%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 807
Ultra 9 288V 8613
+967%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 12.30
Recency 1 April 2016 24 September 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm

Ultra 9 288V has a 1437.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 288V is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 20 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-Z8750 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.