Ryzen 5 7520C vs Atom x7-E3950
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2354 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 7x Intel Atom | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | 9.29 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 26 October 2016 (8 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | FT6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 505 | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.94 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 26 October 2016 | 23 May 2023 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom x7-E3950 has 25% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7520C, on the other hand, has 203.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
