Pentium 4425Y vs Atom x7-E3950
Aggregate performance score
Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Pentium 4425Y by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2351 | 2406 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 7x Intel Atom | no data |
Power efficiency | 9.27 | 16.87 |
Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | no data |
Release date | 26 October 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 January 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | no data | 4 GT/s QPI |
L1 cache | 56K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | FCBGA1515 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1 |
AES-NI | + | + |
vPro | no data | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
My WiFi | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
Smart Response | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 505 | no data |
Max video memory | no data | 16 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 850 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
eDP | no data | + |
DisplayPort | - | + |
HDMI | - | + |
DVI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | no data | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 4 | 10 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.22 | 1.11 |
Recency | 26 October 2016 | 1 January 2019 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom x7-E3950 has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.
Pentium 4425Y, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Pentium 4425Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.