Celeron 900 vs Atom x7-E3950

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2352	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	7x Intel Atom	no data
Power efficiency	9.27	no data
Architecture codename	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	no data
Release date	26 October 2016 (8 years ago)	1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$57	no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	4	no data
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
L1 cache	56K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	2 MB (shared)	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	110 °C	105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	103 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	Intel BGA 1296	PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3, DDR4	no data
Maximum memory size	8 GB	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel HD Graphics 505

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900.

PCIe version	2.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	4	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	26 October 2016	1 January 2009
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---