Celeron G6900 vs Atom x5-Z8300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8300
2015
4 cores / 4 threads
0.51
Celeron G6900
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 46 Watt
2.87
+463%

Celeron G6900 outperforms Atom x5-Z8300 by a whopping 463% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28651664
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data5.90
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date2 March 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.44 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.84 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA592FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)no data46 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 710
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency500 MHz1.3 GHz
Execution Units1216

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported24

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x10804096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes120
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8300 0.51
Celeron G6900 2.87
+463%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-Z8300 814
Celeron G6900 4551
+459%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x5-Z8300 131
Celeron G6900 1681
+1183%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x5-Z8300 354
Celeron G6900 2802
+692%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 2.87
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.85
Recency 2 March 2015 4 January 2022
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2

Atom x5-Z8300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G6900, on the other hand, has a 462.7% higher aggregate performance score, 270.1% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 6 years.

The Celeron G6900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-Z8300 is a notebook processor while Celeron G6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8300 and Celeron G6900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Atom x5-Z8300
Intel Celeron G6900
Celeron G6900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 48 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Celeron G6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8300 or Celeron G6900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.