3020e vs Atom x5-E3930

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E3930
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.58
3020e
2020
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.53
+164%

3020e outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a whopping 164% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28192137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel AtomAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency7.8424.12
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2014−2016)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date30 August 2014 (10 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketIntel BGA 1296FT5
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 500AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E3930 0.58
3020e 1.53
+164%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E3930 928
3020e 2433
+162%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 1.53
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.98
Recency 30 August 2014 4 August 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has a 163.8% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and 16.7% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3930 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E3930 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.