Ultra 5 245KF vs Atom Z670

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data79.32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data21.16
Architecture codenameLincroft (2010−2011)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date11 April 2011 (13 years ago)24 October 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed1.5 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz5.2 GHz
Bus typecDMIno data
Bus rate400 MT/sno data
Multiplier8no data
L1 cache56 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size65 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketT-PBGA5181851
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5
Maximum memory size2.93 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX535N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF integrated GPUs.

LVDS+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20
PCI support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z670 158
Ultra 5 245KF 44396
+27999%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2011 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 14
Threads 2 14
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 125 Watt

Atom Z670 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 5 245KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 1300% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z670 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 5 245KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z670 and Core Ultra 5 245KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z670
Atom Z670
Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF
Core Ultra 5 245KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Atom Z670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 245KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z670 or Core Ultra 5 245KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.