Ryzen Threadripper 1977X vs Atom Z540
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3199 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Atom | no data |
Power efficiency | 8.68 | no data |
Architecture codename | Silverthorne (2008−2010) | Zen (2017−2020) |
Release date | 2 April 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 0.07 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Bus type | FSB | no data |
Bus rate | 533.33 MT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 14 | no data |
L1 cache | 56 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 32768 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 24.18 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 47 Million | no data |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.75 -1.1V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
Socket | PBGA441 | SP3r2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2.4 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | - | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 155 Watt |
Atom Z540 has 7650% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 1977X, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom Z540 is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1977X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z540 and Ryzen Threadripper 1977X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.