Ryzen 5 2600 vs Atom Z3770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated901
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.00
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiencyno data12.09
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018)
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)13 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.46 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.39 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data34
L1 cache64K (per core)576 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data4800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketUTFCBGA1380AM4
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/s46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency667 MHz-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3770 736
Ryzen 5 2600 13189
+1692%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z3770 1189
Ryzen 5 2600 4726
+297%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z3770 3961
Ryzen 5 2600 28173
+611%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom Z3770 2212
Ryzen 5 2600 9290
+320%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom Z3770 26.55
Ryzen 5 2600 5.5
+383%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom Z3770 0.9
Ryzen 5 2600 7.5
+772%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom Z3770 8
Ryzen 5 2600 75
+880%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom Z3770 40
Ryzen 5 2600 205
+407%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom Z3770 898
Ryzen 5 2600 4517
+403%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 September 2013 13 April 2018
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 22 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z3770 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z3770 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3770 and Ryzen 5 2600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Ryzen 5 2600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 14865 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3770 or Ryzen 5 2600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.