Celeron N2910 vs Atom Z3735G

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size112 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketUTFCBGA592FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size1 GB8.79 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequency646 MHz756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3735G 772
Celeron N2910 778
+0.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z3735G 946
+12.1%
Celeron N2910 844

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom Z3735G 2891
Celeron N2910 2907
+0.6%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom Z3735G 1526
Celeron N2910 1612
+5.6%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2014 11 September 2013
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 7 Watt

Atom Z3735G has an age advantage of 6 months, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3735G and Celeron N2910, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
Intel Celeron N2910
Celeron N2910

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 10 votes

Rate Celeron N2910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3735G or Celeron N2910, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.