Pentium M 1.70 vs Atom Z2560
Aggregate performance score
Atom Z2560 outperforms Pentium M 1.70 by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3220 | 3355 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 7.31 | 0.60 |
Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Banias (2003) |
Release date | 27 February 2013 (11 years ago) | June 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 16 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 65 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 140 million | 77 million |
64 bit support | - | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FC-MB4760 | 478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 24 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
Smart Idle | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1, DDR2 |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70.
USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.23 | 0.15 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 24 Watt |
Atom Z2560 has a 53.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.
The Atom Z2560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 1.70 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2560 and Pentium M 1.70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.