EPYC 9655P vs Atom Z2560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z2560
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.23
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+43378%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Atom Z2560 by a whopping 43378% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency7.2223.54
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Turin (2024)
Release date27 February 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.5 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size65 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million99,780 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-MB4760SP5
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE32 Bitno data
Smart Idle+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128
USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0no data
Number of USB ports2no data
UART3no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 100.00
Recency 27 February 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 400 Watt

Atom Z2560 has 13233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 43378.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z2560 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z2560 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9655P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2560 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2560
Atom Z2560
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.9 10 votes

Rate Atom Z2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 177 votes

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2560 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.