Ultra 9 285K vs Atom Z2460

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated53
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data74.28
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiencyno data32.43
Architecture codenamePenwell (2012−2013)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data250 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size65 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors140 million17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFC-MB46171851
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIO152no data

Security technologies

Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
HDMI+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20
USB revision2.0 OTGno data
Number of USB ports1no data
UART3no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2012 24 October 2024
Physical cores 1 24
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 125 Watt

Atom Z2460 has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 2300% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z2460 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2460 and Core Ultra 9 285K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2460
Atom Z2460
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Core Ultra 9 285K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Atom Z2460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 159 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 285K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2460 or Core Ultra 9 285K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.