Xeon Gold 5416S vs Atom S1260
Primary details
Comparing Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 230 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 64.00 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.29 |
| Architecture codename | Centerton (2012) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 10 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $64 | $944 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 79 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCBGA1283 | FCLGA4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8.5 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4400 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 1 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 5 |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 80 |
| PCI support | PCI Support | no data |
| UART | UART | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 December 2012 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 8 Watt | 150 Watt |
Atom S1260 has 1775% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5416S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom S1260 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
