Ryzen 7 7840U vs Atom N570

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N570
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.21
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
15.71
+7381%

Ryzen 7 7840U outperforms Atom N570 by a whopping 7381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3206435
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency2.2153.06
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date1 March 2011 (13 years ago)May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate666 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size87 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors176 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FP8
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N570 0.21
Ryzen 7 7840U 15.71
+7381%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N570 341
Ryzen 7 7840U 24960
+7220%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N570 82
Ryzen 7 7840U 2082
+2439%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N570 217
Ryzen 7 7840U 8744
+3929%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N570 566
Ryzen 7 7840U 6669
+1079%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N570 1630
Ryzen 7 7840U 38490
+2262%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N570 738
Ryzen 7 7840U 12482
+1591%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N570 59
Ryzen 7 7840U 3.51
+1581%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 15.71
Integrated graphics card 0.01 18.32
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 28 Watt

Atom N570 has 250% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7840U, on the other hand, has a 7381% higher aggregate performance score, 183100% faster integrated GPU, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7840U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N570 and Ryzen 7 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N570
Atom N570
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 245 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N570 or Ryzen 7 7840U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.