HD Graphics 520 vs Atom N2850
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Intel HD Graphics |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | Gen9 |
| Release date | 5 January 2012 (12 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
| Threads | 4 | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 0.35 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm0.014 μm 1.4e-5 mm |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6,6 Watt | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32,768 MB 33,554,432 KB 34,359,738,368 B 0.0313 TiB 32 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
HD Graphics 520 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2850 and HD Graphics 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
