Ultra 9 285T vs Atom N2800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)January 2025
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads424
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm3 nm
Die size66 mm2243 mm2
Number of transistors176 million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA5591851
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size4.88 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 24
Threads 4 24
Chip lithography 32 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

Atom N2800 has 483.3% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 966.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N2800 is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2800 and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2800
Atom N2800
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 103 votes

Rate Atom N2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2800 or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.