Pentium M 1300 vs Atom N270

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N270
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.09
Pentium M 1300
1 core / 1 thread, 24 Watt
0.12
+33.3%

Pentium M 1300 outperforms Atom N270 by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33963352
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomPentium M
Power efficiency3.410.46
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Banias (2003)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$44no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s400 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437no data
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N270 0.09
Pentium M 1300 0.12
+33.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N270 136
Pentium M 1300 197
+44.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.09 0.12
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 24 Watt

Atom N270 has 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

Pentium M 1300, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Pentium M 1300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Pentium M 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Pentium M 1300
Pentium M 1300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Pentium M 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Pentium M 1300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.