Atom C3308 vs N270

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N270 and Atom C3308 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3395not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.41no data
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$44$32

Detailed specifications

Atom N270 and Atom C3308 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier1216
L1 cache56 KB112 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C89 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom N270 and Atom C3308 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt9.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N270 and Atom C3308. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom N270 and Atom C3308 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N270 and Atom C3308 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N270 and Atom C3308. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4: 1866
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N270 and Atom C3308.

PCIe versionno data3
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data3
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data4x2.5/1 GBE

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 15 August 2017
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 9 Watt

Atom N270 has 350% lower power consumption.

Atom C3308, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N270 and Atom C3308. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N270 is a notebook processor while Atom C3308 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N270 and Atom C3308, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N270
Atom N270
Intel Atom C3308
Atom C3308

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 252 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3308 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N270 or Atom C3308, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.