Opteron 140 vs Atom N2600
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 140 outperforms Atom N2600 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom N2600 and Opteron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3179 | 3153 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Atom | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.44 | 0.28 |
| Architecture codename | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | 1 December 2011 (12 years ago) | September 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $47 | $596 |
Detailed specifications
Atom N2600 and Opteron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom N2600 and Opteron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA559 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3.5 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Opteron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Atom N2600 and Opteron 140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Opteron 140 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Opteron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2.44 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.25 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 85 Watt |
Atom N2600 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 306.3% more advanced lithography process, and 2733.3% lower power consumption.
Opteron 140, on the other hand, has a 8.7% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom N2600 and Opteron 140.
Be aware that Atom N2600 is a notebook processor while Opteron 140 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2600 and Opteron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
