Celeron 925 vs Atom N2600

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N2600 and Celeron 925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCedarview-M (2011−2012)no data
Release date1 December 2011 (12 years ago)1 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$47no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N2600 and Celeron 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom N2600 and Celeron 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCBGA559no data
Power consumption (TDP)3.5 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N2600 and Celeron 925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron 925 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N2600 and Celeron 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size2.44 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N2600 360
Celeron 925 477
+32.5%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2011 1 January 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 35 Watt

Atom N2600 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom N2600 and Celeron 925. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N2600 and Celeron 925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N2600
Atom N2600
Intel Celeron 925
Celeron 925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 181 vote

Rate Atom N2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N2600 or Celeron 925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.