Mobile Sempron 3800+ vs Atom E680

Place in the ranking	3189	3205
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	no data	Mobile Sempron
Power efficiency	5.21	0.64
Architecture codename	Tunnel Creek (2010)	Sherman (2009)
Release date	14 September 2010 (14 years ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	2	1
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	2.2 GHz
Bus rate	no data	800 MHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	no data
Chip lithography	45 nm	65 nm
Die size	26 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	47 million	no data
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	Intel BGA 676	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR2

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

Intel GMA 600

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E680 0.22
+4.8%

Mobile Sempron 3800+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E680 346
+3.3%

Mobile Sempron 3800+ 335

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.22	0.21
Threads	2	1
Chip lithography	45 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	4 Watt	31 Watt

Atom E680 has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 675% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+.

Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E680 and Mobile Sempron 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.