Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 vs Atom E645C

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated495
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9)
Power efficiencyno data48.77
Architecture codenameStellarton (2010)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2024)
Release date22 November 2010 (14 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Boost clock speed1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data54 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size26 mm2no data
Number of transistors47 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA1466FP8
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataUSB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 600AMD Radeon 880M

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2010 1 October 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 16 AMD Zen 5 AMD Zen 5c
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 28 Watt

Atom E645C has -87.5% more threads, and 600% lower power consumption.

Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 700% more physical cores, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E645C and Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E645C
Atom E645C
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom E645C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E645C or Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.