Xeon Platinum 8592V vs Atom E640
Primary details
Comparing Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Tunnel Creek (2010) | Emerald Rapids |
| Release date | 14 September 2010 (13 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 320 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 26 mm2 | 2x 763 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 78 °C |
| Number of transistors | 47 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 676 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 330 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel GMA 600 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 September 2010 | 14 December 2023 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 64 |
| Threads | 2 | 128 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 330 Watt |
Atom E640 has 10900% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8592V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 6300% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom E640 is a notebook processor while Xeon Platinum 8592V is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E640 and Xeon Platinum 8592V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
