Atom Z3770 vs E3845

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.66
+43.5%
Atom Z3770
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.46

Atom E3845 outperforms Atom Z3770 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27412919
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAtomno data
Power efficiency6.255.44
Architecture codenameBay Trail-I (2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$37

Detailed specifications

Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.91 GHz2.39 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA1170UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.1 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3845 0.66
+43.5%
Atom Z3770 0.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3845 1052
+42.9%
Atom Z3770 736

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 0.46
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

Atom E3845 has a 43.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3770, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Atom E3845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3845 and Atom Z3770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845
Intel Atom Z3770
Atom Z3770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 19 votes

Rate Atom Z3770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E3845 or Atom Z3770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.