Athlon 3000G vs Atom E3845

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom E3845
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.66
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+327%

Athlon 3000G outperforms Atom E3845 by a whopping 327% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27411672
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAtomAMD Athlon
Power efficiency6.257.63
Architecture codenameBay Trail-I (2013)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)21 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.91 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2?
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom E3845 0.66
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+327%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom E3845 1052
Athlon 3000G 4484
+326%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 2.82
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.98
Recency 8 October 2013 21 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 35 Watt

Atom E3845 has 100% more physical cores, and 250% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 327.3% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom E3845 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom E3845 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom E3845 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom E3845
Atom E3845
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 18 votes

Rate Atom E3845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2097 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom E3845 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.