EPYC 9654 vs Atom D525

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated6
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.29
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data19.90
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)96
Threads4192
Base clock speed1.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache64K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)96 MB
L3 cache0 KB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size66 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP5
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom D525 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D525 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D525 402
EPYC 9654 120295
+29824%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom D525 77
EPYC 9654 1827
+2273%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom D525 187
EPYC 9654 18626
+9860%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 96
Threads 4 192
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 360 Watt

Atom D525 has 2669.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 4700% more physical cores and 4700% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom D525 and EPYC 9654. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 216 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.