Celeron N4000 vs Atom D510

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D510
2009
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.26
Celeron N4000
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.93
+258%

Celeron N4000 outperforms Atom D510 by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31592528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.8914.67
Architecture codenamePineview (2009−2011)Goldmont Plus (2017)
Release date21 December 2009 (15 years ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$97$107

Detailed specifications

Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz2.6 GHz
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 deg C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB8 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D510 and Celeron N4000.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D510 0.26
Celeron N4000 0.93
+258%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D510 406
Celeron N4000 1472
+263%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.93
Recency 21 December 2009 11 December 2017
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 6 Watt

Atom D510 has 100% more threads.

Celeron N4000, on the other hand, has a 257.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom D510 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D510 and Celeron N4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D510
Atom D510
Intel Celeron N4000
Celeron N4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 52 votes

Rate Atom D510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 942 votes

Rate Celeron N4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D510 or Celeron N4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.