Xeon w9-3595X vs Atom D2700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated13
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.24
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data15.30
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$52$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads4120
Base clock speed2.13 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.13 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB112.5 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size66 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors176 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
AMT-no data
HD Audio+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 GB4 TB
Max memory channels18
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes4112
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2700 467
Xeon w9-3595X 98888
+21075%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 24 August 2024
Physical cores 2 60
Threads 4 120
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 385 Watt

Atom D2700 has 3750% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 2900% more physical cores and 2900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D2700 is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2700 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2700
Atom D2700
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 29 votes

Rate Atom D2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2700 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.