EPYC 9335 vs Atom D2550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency2.46no data
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,178

Detailed specifications

Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.86 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size66 mm24x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors176 million33,260 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt210 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
VT-i-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 (640 MHz)N/A

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes4128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 210 Watt

Atom D2550 has 2000% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9335, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom D2550 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9335 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2550 and EPYC 9335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2550
Atom D2550
AMD EPYC 9335
EPYC 9335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Atom D2550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2550 or EPYC 9335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.