Ryzen 3 7320U vs Atom C3958
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Atom C3958 by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1633 | 1084 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 92 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.54 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Atom | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Mendocino-U (Zen 2) |
| Release date | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 896 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 83 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Atom C3958 by 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 7320U outperforms Atom C3958 by 108% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.77 | 5.76 |
| Recency | 15 August 2017 | 20 September 2022 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 15 Watt |
Atom C3958 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 3 7320U, on the other hand, has a 107.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 106.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 7320U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3958 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom C3958 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 7320U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3958 and Ryzen 3 7320U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
