Atom C3538 vs C3955

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3955
2017
16 cores / 16 threads, 32 Watt
3.65
+207%
Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.19

Atom C3955 outperforms Atom C3538 by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3955 and Atom C3538 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15002361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.940.04
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency10.797.51
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$434$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom C3955 has 2250% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3955 and Atom C3538 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.1 GHz
Multiplier2121
L1 cache896 KB224 KB
L2 cache16 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB8 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C87 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3955 and Atom C3538 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3955 and Atom C3538. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-+
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--

Security technologies

Atom C3955 and Atom C3538 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3955 and Atom C3538 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3955 and Atom C3538. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4: 2133
Maximum memory size256 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s29.871 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3955 and Atom C3538.

PCIe version33
PCI Express lanes1612
USB revision33
Total number of SATA ports1612
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports1612
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBE2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3955 3.65
+207%
Atom C3538 1.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3955 5803
+207%
Atom C3538 1889

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.65 1.19
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3955 has a 206.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Atom C3538, on the other hand, has 113.3% lower power consumption.

The Atom C3955 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3538 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3955 and Atom C3538, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3955
Atom C3955
Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3955 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3955 or Atom C3538, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.