Ultra 7 265KF vs Atom C3850

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated94
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data98.31
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data27.97
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$323$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data12
Threads1220
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache672 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310FCLGA1851
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN

Security technologies

Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size256 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version35.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 24 October 2024
Physical cores 12 20
Threads 12 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

Atom C3850 has 400% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3850 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3850
Atom C3850
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 63 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Atom C3850 and Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.