EPYC 4484PX vs Atom C3808

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated126
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.67
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data25.38
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$369$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1224
Base clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5.6 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache672 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature86 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310AM5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1628
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 21 May 2024
Threads 12 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 120 Watt

Atom C3808 has 380% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3808 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3808
Atom C3808
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3808 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.