Processor U300 vs Atom C3758

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3758 and Processor U300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1655not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.52no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Raptor Lake-U
Power efficiency10.98no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raptor Lake-U (2023)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$193$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3758 and Processor U300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)5 (Penta-Core)
Threads86
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rateno data55 MHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache448 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature82 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3758 and Processor U300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310Intel BGA 1744
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Processor U300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+

Security technologies

Atom C3758 and Processor U300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Processor U300 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Processor U300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2400DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Processor U300.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes168
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports16no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports16no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x10/2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 5
Threads 8 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

Atom C3758 has 60% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

Processor U300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3758 and Processor U300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Processor U300 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Processor U300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758
Intel Processor U300
Processor U300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 12 votes

Rate Processor U300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3758 or Processor U300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.